Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Latimore v. Clinton Police Department
as 6:2023cv05390
Plaintiff:
Denzell Tyree Latimore
Defendant:
City of Clinton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dunbar v. Hammans et al
as 5:2020cv00595
Plaintiff:
Damon Neal Dunbar, Jr
Defendant:
Staci Hunter, Elaina Flores, Ricky McPhearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Clinton Police Department et al
as 6:2017cv03207
Plaintiff:
Keith Jermaine Price
Defendant:
Clinton Police Department, Lt Jones, S Lawton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Ruiz, Jr. v. Snodgrass, et al
as 13-3369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raul Velasquez Ruiz, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Snodgrass, Officer of Clinton Police Department, Ross Barlow, Clinton County A.D.A., Gorden Miller, Retired IDPS/DCI/SOR and others
Ruiz v. Officer Snodgrass et al
as 1:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Raul V Ruiz, Jr
Defendant:
Officer Snodgrass, Clinton Police Department, Iowa Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Brown v. Walter Bentley
as 13-6061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS ALEC BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS L. COPELAND, WALTER BENTLEY, LIEUTENANT WHITE, Clinton Police Department and others
Huff v. Clinton Police Department et al
as 5:2007cv01120
Plaintiff:
Solomon Lesean Huff
Defendant:
Clinton Police Department and Custer County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. Clinton Police Department et al
as 5:2007cv00742
Plaintiff:
Solomon Lesean Huff
Defendant:
Clinton Police Department, Mike Murley and Custer County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dedmon v. Burgess et al
as 5:2007cv00733
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ian Dedmon
Defendant:
Mike Burgess and Clinton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
