Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Thomas v. Samuel et al
as 2:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Gregory Samuel, Isaac Kwarteng, Jerry Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macon v. Smokle et al
as 4:2021cv01247
Plaintiff:
James Macon
Defendant:
K. Smokle, Chaplin Sweeny, Zulkowis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugas v. The State Of Texas et al
as 2:2019cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Dugas
Defendant:
Municipal of Beeville, University Texas Medical Branch, McConnell Unit Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rojas v. Martinez et al
as 2:2018cv00238
Defendant:
John Doe, Georgy Samuel, Placido Samniego, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hand v. Denver Health et al
as 1:2018cv00534
Plaintiff:
Georgie Louise Hand
Defendant:
Denver Health, Michael A. Fleisher, Scott D. Tomsick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Feldman et al
as 1:2017cv10116
Plaintiff:
Theodore Brandon Edwards
Defendant:
Feldman, K. Georgy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. United States of America
as 16-3412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Royce Corley
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Detention Center, Brooklyn, Frank Strada, Warden and others
McIntosh v. Strada
as 16-2676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louis McIntosh
Defendant - Appellee:
Frank Strada, Duke Terrell, Paige, Unit Manager and others
Banks v. Howard County Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00207
Plaintiff:
Charles Banks
Defendant:
Howard County Dept of Corrections, Georgie and Sciandra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sessoms v. White et al
as 1:2014cv04408
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Borecky, P.A. Duncan, Mr. Georgi and others
Clinical Director:
Robin Edwin
Plaintiff:
Gary Sessoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
