Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Almeda v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2019cv12275
Defendant:
Dr. Sharig Ahmad, Warden S. Spaulding, Kevin Elker and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Almeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almeda v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv00783
Defendant:
Dr. Sharig Ahmad, Dr. NFN Yeh, Kevin Elker and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Almeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leroy Wells v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 17-35095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, JUDY GILMORE, BRAD CAIN and others
Strunk v. Capps et al
as 3:2016cv01470
Plaintiff:
Harmon C Strunk Jr
Defendant:
William Restro, NFN Hunter, NFN Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America, Rodney Chandler, Charles E Samuels, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De La Cruz v. Graber et al
as 3:2014cv03846
Plaintiff:
Armando Garcia De La Cruz
Defendant:
John Doe, Katie N Freeman, Carlos Mier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martikean v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01774
Plaintiff:
Glenn L. Martikean
Defendant:
United States of America, M Cruz, NFN Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard v. Capps et al
as 3:2007cv00138
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Richard
Defendant:
J Capps, S Middleton and Marne Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Fleming, et al
as 06-10451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDY RAY MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
L E FLEMING, PAUL CELESTIN, JOHN MILLS and others
In re: Baker, Todd v. DC, et al
as 01-5205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Emerson Baker
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ronald Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
