Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORR. INST., RITHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Buncombe County Jail Doctor et al
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Charles Jordan
Defendant:
Buncombe County Jail Doctor, Asheville Police, Buncombe County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, JOHN DOE #2, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitener v. The Rutherford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Chris Francis, Jane Doe 1, RCDC's Healthcare Provider and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dale Whitener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2020cv00634
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
CHIEF CERELYN DAVIS, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DURHAM, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARMER v. DOE #1 et al
as 1:2019cv01111
Plaintiff:
DEE DEIDRE FARMER
Defendant:
DUKE REGIONAL HOSPITAL and JANE DOE #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIELDS v. GODFREY et al
as 1:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SHIELDS , JR.
Defendant:
NEIL GODFREY, CONWAY, MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2018ct03034
Plaintiff:
David M. Harold
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety, John Does 1-100 and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMPKINS v. CLELLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00772
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
JACK CLELLAND, K. DIGGS, JANE DOE FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
