Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cantrell v. Strong et al
as 3:2021cv00015
Defendant:
Reggie Sellers, Jeremy Killgore, Spencer Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buzzard v. Jividen et al
as 3:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Dean Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Karen Pszczolkowski, William Yurcina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buzzard v. Jividen et al
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
David Dean Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Karen Pszczolkowski, Randall S. Mutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buzzard v. Jividen et al
as 2:2018cv00548
Plaintiff:
David Dean Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Karen Pszczolkowski, Randall S. Mutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Cordle v. Amanda Sabatino
as 17-7374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY CORDLE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMANDA SABATINO, LPN, JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, WVDOC, KAREN PSZCZOLKOWSKI, Warden, Northern Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Nurse, Northern Correctional Facility Staff
Holcomb v. Pszczolkowski
as 3:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Holcomb
Defendant:
Karen Pszczolkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harding v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Smitty Harding
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Cecelia Janiszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Pszczolkowski et al
as 5:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Mark Riley
Defendant:
Karen Pszczolkowski, Ryan Adams and Sharon Y. Hanke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. Pszczolkowski et al
as 1:2016cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jason Browning
Defendant:
Karen Pszczolkowski, Jim Rubenstein, William Yurcina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordle v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2016cv00018
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dale Griffith, Jim Rubenstein and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Cordle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
