Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Talley v. Murray et al
as 4:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Talley
Defendant:
Bill J Murray, Paul Monk and QCHC Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilhite v. Parker et al
as 7:2020cv00847
Defendant:
Jameson T. Parker, Marcus Haynes, Charles Monk and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Parker et al
as 7:2018cv01300
Defendant:
Monk, E Hynes and Jameson Parker
Plaintiff:
Sheyenne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossman v. Monk et al
as 2:2017cv00986
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
Sam Monk, John Beehler, Brian McLeigh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathey v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
Daveon Lamarnce Cathey
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Monk, Patrick Eugene and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00757
Plaintiff:
Marshall Montgomery
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kim Tobias Thomas, J. C. Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2010cv00961
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Circuit Court of Calhoun County, Alabama and Samuel Monk, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Shelby County Corrections Facility et al
as 2:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Laron Frazier
Defendant:
Shelby County Corrections Facility, Parker, Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Flemmings et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00787
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Danny Flemmings, J. C. Giles and M. Larry Monk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hausey v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Hausey, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Michael S. Lusk, Murrell Vardaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
