Civil Rights Cases
Ramori Rogers, Sr. v. Gallion, et al
as 22-15939
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAMORI VAUGHN ROGERS, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: GALLION, Unknown; named as S.I.S. Gallion, S.I.S., "Investigator" at USP Tucson, AMANDA STANGL, named as Case Manager Amanda Stangl, E-1 Case Manager at USP Tucson, BYLER, Unknown; named as Counselor Mr. Byler, E-1-E-2 Counselor at USP Tucson and others
Rogers v. Stangl et al
as 4:2022cv00185
Plaintiff: Ramori Vaughn Rogers, Sr.
Defendant: Amanda Stangl, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Freeman v. Ryan et al
as 4:2020cv00101
Defendant: CR Glynn, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Lopez and others
Plaintiff: Benjamin Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Jones v. Ronald Givans, et al
as 5:2018cv00754
Defendant: Lt. FNU Hackett, Lt. James Tana, FNU Stangle and others
Plaintiff: Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Geivans et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00204
Defendant: Lt. James Tana, Warden Stangle, Sgt. Green and others
Plaintiff: Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Johnson, Jr. v. S. Holmstrom, et al
as 09-56856
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY WAYNE JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: S. HOLMSTROM, Correctional Officer, Calipatria State Prison, M GAINS, Correctional Officer, Calipatria State Prison, J. BELTRAN, Correctional Officer, Calipatria State Prison and others
Johnson v. Gains et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01312
Plaintiff: Anthony Wayne Johnson, Jr.
Defendant: M Gains, S Holmstrom, J Beltran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Cox et al
as 5:2007cv00199
Plaintiff: Carl Wiley
Defendant: Ashley Cox, Nick Muntos, B Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?