Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Miranda v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv02344
Plaintiff:
Abel Anthony Miranda
Defendant:
Dian Combs, Christopher Kircher, Marc Elrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Schlemm, David v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2021cv00331
Defendant:
Jeanie M. Kramer, E. Davidson, Stephen Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Schlemm
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien v. Murphy et al
as 1:2020cv00153
Defendant:
Adam Robinette, Ripley County Sheriff's Department and Stephen Murphy
Plaintiff:
Edward James Martin O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Barksdale Airforce Base et al
as 3:2016cv00206
Defendant:
Barksdale Airforce Base and Camtrak Chemical Emergency
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 3:2016cv00207
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railroad and Union Pacific Railroad
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Kansas City Southern Railway
as 3:2016cv00161
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Kansas City Southern Railroad
as 5:2016cv00333
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railroad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Calumet Lubricate
as 5:2016cv00332
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
Calumet Lubricate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Facebook et al
as 3:2016cv00062
Defendant:
1-800-647-2328, 1-800-900-9000, 1-800-CALL-WELLS and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Calumet Lubricate et al
as 3:2016cv00045
Defendant:
Calumet Lubricate and www.dairypure.com
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
