Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ray III v. Kerstein et al
as 2:2019cv11397
Defendant:
Kerstein, Wayne County Jail, CCS Home Office and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray III
Ray v. Pursell et al
as 2:2014cv27457
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray, III
Defendant:
Steven Wolf , United States Marshals Service and Madonna Pursell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. Prime Care Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray, III
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical and Jane Doe (2) Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Ray, III v. Urology Health Team PLLC, et al
as 16-14923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RAY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
UROLOGY HEALTH TEAM PLLC, in his/her individual and official capacity, IRA W. KLIMBERG, in his individual and official capacity and JOHN D. THOMPSON, in his individual and official capacity
Ray v. Urology Health Team PLLC et al
as 5:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray, III
Defendant:
Urology Health Team PLLC, Ira W. Klimberg and John D. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas Ray, III v. Michelle, et al
as 15-5963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RAY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE MICHELLE, CARTER COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICER, Unknown Officer that works at jail, MATT BARKER and others
Ray v. Fritzshall
as 1:2015cv01352
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray, III
Defendant:
Steve Fritzshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Michelle et al
as 0:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Michelle, Carter County Sherrif Officer, Matt Barker and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Michelle et al
as 3:2015cv00056
Defendant:
Michelle, Carter County Sherrif Officer, Matt Barker and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Pursel et al
as 3:2014cv27457
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray, III
Defendant:
Madonna Pursel, Steven Wolf and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
