Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Varner v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Varner
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, FCPD/Head Chaplain Henry Hansard and Rev. Ulli Klemm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks, Running River, Dale Arnold and others
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, Head Chaplain Henry Hansard, Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitwalli v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Walid Esmat Mitwalli
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry and Rev. Ulli Klemm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRITT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv02861
Plaintiff:
JORI BRITT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY GEORGE E. LITTLE and DTS REV ULLI KLEMM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nunez, Jr. v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Fernando Nunez, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel R. Harry, Michael Wenerowicz, Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oracio Sanchez, Jr. v. Ulli Klemm, et al
as 22-3171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORACIO SANCHEZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ULLI KLEMM and TRACY SMITH
Payne v. Butts et al
as 3:2021cv01305
Plaintiff:
Joshua Payne
Defendant:
Charles Butts, Crig Copper, Margaret Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROTEN v. KLEMM et al
as 2:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
PAUL AURANDT, DEBRA HAWKINBERRY, JOSEPH TREMPUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Peterson v. Morris et al
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Sylvia Morris and Ulli Klemm
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carter, III v. Klemm et al
as 1:2020cv01923
Defendant:
Jill J. Spyker, Ulli Klemm and Darrell Wireman
Plaintiff:
Harold Sanford Carter, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
