Cases 141 - 150 of 2,972
Key v. Doe et al
as 6:2022cv03173
Plaintiff:
Felix Key
Defendant:
John Doe, John 2 Doe, Jane Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03164
Plaintiff:
Jared Williams, Anthony Zarro, Antonio West and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Anna Boyles, Joan Reinkemeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
as 6:2022cv03162
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Moose and Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hower v. Dr. Scott et al
as 2:2022cv04098
Plaintiff:
Skylar A Hower and Skyler A Hower
Defendant:
Dr. Scott, Dr. Jane Doe, Bales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bivens v. Masson
as 5:2022cv06072
Plaintiff:
Davion Bivens
Defendant:
Jonathan J Masson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving v. Blackmon et al
as 2:2022cv04094
Plaintiff:
William Irving
Defendant:
Romelle Blackmon, Raina Martin, Debra Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinderman v. Parsons et al
as 6:2022cv03154
Plaintiff:
Karl Hinderman
Defendant:
Cassidy Parsons, Peter S Kirn, Pamela Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Jackson County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Diego I. Garcia
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail and H-TO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
Charles E Banks
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv06064
Plaintiff:
Casey James Harrison
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Thomas Ingersol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
