Cases 141 - 150 of 10,852
SINGLETON
as 5:2024cv00381
Not Yet Classified:
AL-JALEEL SINGLETON
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY, JANINE DONATE, STEVEN MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. CALIGURI et al
as 2:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
E CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE, DR BASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. SCHOPPE et al
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOPPE and C.O. OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARDWELL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, SHANE DADY, SERGEANT CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. INMATE ACCOUNT et al
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
INMATE ACCOUNT, K. DONNELY, N. DELLIPONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, R. MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wapinsky et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams
Defendant:
Warden Wapinsky and C.O. Donalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS et al.
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, SUPERINTENDENT, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REHWALD v. SCI GREENE
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP REHWALD
Defendant:
SCI GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCUNE and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
