Cases 11 - 20 of 23,451
Richardson v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Willie L Richardson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Randy Smith, . Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03169
Plaintiff:
Maza Lynch
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, . Owens, . Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03172
Plaintiff:
Michael L Williams
Defendant:
Anthony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deana Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Cederholm et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Carter
Defendant:
. Cederholm, . Silva, . Righteous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torbert v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv03167
Plaintiff:
Jovan A. Torbert
Defendant:
Jack Campbell, Larry Beck, Bill Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv03168
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, John Baldwin and Unknown IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomax v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Justin Lomax
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lionel Scott Ellison
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana Attorney Generals Office, Austin Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, JUDGE MARSHALL J. PICCINNI, NICOLE SOLANE KONDRLIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Tatum v. Correctional Officer Hunter, et al
as 24-2088
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TATUM
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUNTER, KARL BRADFORD, sued as Lieutenant Bradford, DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
