Cases 11 - 20 of 113
Garcia v. Kane County Adult Justice Center et al
as 1:2023cv02023
Plaintiff:
Francisco J Garcia
Defendant:
Kane County Adult Justice Center and Sheriff Ron Hain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. Hain et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Plaintiff:
Parisa G. Lockett
Defendant:
Ron Hain, J Brediau and Security Personel Administrators & Classification Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. NAPOLEON et al
as 2:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
TARIQ QAADIR BAILEY
Defendant:
NAPOLEON, HAINES, VANDIVNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Wexford Health Service Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Wexford Health Service Inc., Dr. West, Kim Czerniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. Hain et al
as 1:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Parisa G. Lockett
Defendant:
Ron Hain, Serg Bredlau, Dr. Sood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Span v. Haine et al
as 1:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Defendant:
Ronald Haine, Jason, Jennifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Kane County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Kane County Jail, Kane County, Illinois, Ron Hain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus Henderson v. Gary Boughton, et al
as 22-2851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BOUGHTON, PETER HAIBREGTTSE, TIM HAINES, Superintendent and others
THOMPSON v. HAINES et al
as 2:2022cv04051
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH THOMPSON
Defendant:
DAVID HAINES, DIORIO, CROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
