Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Jordan v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
D.O.C., Jennifer Reis, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Tyrick Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Doherty et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Amauri Rodriguez
Defendant:
Daniel Doherty, Batten, F. Saleh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibbison v. Scagliarni et al
as 3:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Ibbison
Defendant:
Scagliarni, Swol, Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Bowers, Nickols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currytto v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Kevin W. Currytto
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Angel Quiros, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Machinski et al
as 3:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Sharlim Marie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tricia A. Machinski and Ompakash Pillai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Sharonda Carlos, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Abisai Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Doe and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
