Cases 21 - 29 of 29
QADR v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01443
Plaintiff:
NUR QADR
Defendant:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CESERINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archie Tindell v. Secretary PA Dept Corr, et al
as 13-3832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. SKUNDA, M. LUCAS and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
E. APODACA and HAGGERTY
Eller v. Hartley et al
as 1:2013cv02029
Defendant:
Steve Hartley, Daryl Vigil, Renee Apodaca and others
Plaintiff:
William Eller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LATIK MOORE
Defendant:
DENNIS CLAYTON ADAMS, II, GILL, D.J. ROOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINDELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WENTEL, DEBRA SAUERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Apodaca v. Zavaras, et al
as 10-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE APODACA
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director of CDOC, SUSAN JONES, CDOC Warden, CSP, WILLIAM CLASPELL, Invesigator for Inspector General's Office, CDOC and others
Apodaca v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2010cv00755
Plaintiff:
Steve Apodaca
Defendant:
Aristedes W. Zavaras, Susan Jones, William Claspell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Apodaca v. White et al
as 1:2009cv00947
Plaintiff:
Dimas Apodaca
Defendant:
Darren White, Ronald C Torres and Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Apodaca v. Claspell et al
as 1:2009cv00284
Plaintiff:
Steve Apodaca
Defendant:
Bill Claspell and Peggy Steele
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
