Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Abbott v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00465
Plaintiff:
James Abbott
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Dr. Saddiq, Jeff Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Appling County Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Waymon D. Shaw
Defendant:
Appling County Detention Center, Adam Bell, Mark Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ocampo v. Appling Healthcare System et al
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Ocampo
Defendant:
Appling Healthcare System and Appling County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dasher v. Eunice et al
as 2:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Danny Dashaun Dasher
Defendant:
Robert Eunice, Toyna Carter and The Appling County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Evans et al
as 2:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Vernon Lee Tyson
Defendant:
Jeff Evans and Appling County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnny Jackson v. Benny Deloach, et al
as 16-11913
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY SCOTT JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BENNY DELOACH, ADAM BELL and APPLING COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Studstill v. Tanner et al
as 2:2015cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kelby Van Studstill
Defendant:
Scottie Tanner, Ronnie K. Lewis, Appling County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slotwinski v. State of IL et al
as 1:2015cv07437
Plaintiff:
Christopher Slotwinski
Defendant:
State of IL, IDOC, Enron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Bell et al
as 2:2015cv00056
Plaintiff:
Joel Shane Jackson
Defendant:
Adam Bell, Benny Deloach and Appling County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Deloach et al
as 2:2015cv00051
Plaintiff:
Johnny Scotty Jackson
Defendant:
Benny Deloach, Adam Bell and Appling County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
