Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Craig v. DeKalb County Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00824
Plaintiff:
William Edward Craig, Jr.
Defendant:
Jimmie Harris and DeKalb County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02329
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Perkins
Defendant:
Georgia Dept of Corrections, Georgia Parole Board, Samuel Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Barksdale v. Roger Scott, et al
as 18-2094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL KEITH BARKSDALE
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER SCOTT, Sheriff, DEKALB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JEREMY GRUBBS, #4230 Detective and others
DRIGGINS v. DEKALB COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
DONALD L DRIGGINS
Defendant:
DEKALB COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matherly v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv00369
Plaintiff:
Jason Matherly
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail and Deputy Schults
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scaife v. Favre et al
as 1:2017cv08946
Plaintiff:
Nerak Scaife
Defendant:
Naomi Favre, Shane Davis, DeKalb County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv01321
Plaintiff:
Stevie Eugene Wood
Defendant:
David Davis, Pam Simpson, Jimmy Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicks v. Nassau County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00454
Plaintiff:
David B. Wicks
Defendant:
Nassau County Jail and DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. DeKalb County Jail Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv50352
Plaintiff:
DeWayne A. Jones
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail Corporation, Roger A. Scott, Parnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Kremin v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 16-3582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brian Kremlin
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Western Missouri Correctional Center, WMCC Case Workers Housing Units 10,9,8,7,4 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
