Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Lord Versatile v. Loretta Kelly
as 12-6858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Leon Coward
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, A. F. MILLER, Operations Officer, Sussex I State Prison, L. RODRIGUES, Correctional Officer Sgt., Sussex I State Prison and others
Defendant:
D. HUDSON, Grievance Coordinator, Sussex I State Prison, SHARON S. BURGESS, Regional Office Appeals Manager, MELISSA WELCH, Offender Discipline Unit Manager and others
Versatile v. Kelly et al
as 3:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Lord Versatile
Defendant:
Loretta Kelly, A. David Robinson and T. Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Tucker et al
as 2:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Watson
Defendant:
J. Tucker, W. Campbell, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Versatile v. Kelly et al
as 3:2011cv00308
Plaintiff:
Lord Versatile
Defendant:
Loretta Kelly, A. F. Miller, D. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooten v. Fowlkes et al
as 5:2011cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mark T Hooten
Defendant:
Joseph Fowlkes, Monica Hill, Robert Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasa v. Malone et al
as 5:2010cv00358
Plaintiff:
Susa Nasa
Defendant:
Victoria Malone, Mrs McCary and J. Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Hall et al
as 5:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, Steve Upton, Glen Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Donald et al
as 5:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
James E Donald, Hilton Hall, Glenn Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Kelly et al
as 3:2008cv00563
Plaintiff:
Mayfield Hope
Defendant:
Loretta Kelly, J. A. Woodson, K. Emran and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nicely v. Gamble et al
as 5:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
Prince E. Nicely
Defendant:
Dr. Gamble, Dr. Fowlkes, Dr. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
