Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Lomax v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Felicia Lomax
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Frank Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Coppage, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wilson
Defendant:
Officer Coppage, Officer Urqheart and Frank Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Napier et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
David O. Oliver
Defendant:
Victor Napier, The Segregation Board of Kilby Correctional Facility and Frank Albright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vaughn
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Sam Cochran, City of Mobile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franks v. Barrett (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00946
Plaintiff:
John R. Franks
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Albright, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00789
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Bass Hall
Defendant:
Frank Albright, Warden Ellington, Dr. Gam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Frank et al
as 1:2012cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Dixon
Defendant:
Chris Frank and Rochelle Harvelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodyard v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00566
Plaintiff:
Draper Frank Woodyard
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Tony Patterson, Jesse Walter Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abro v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00583
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Lawana Abro
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Frank Albright and Napoleon Goodson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lawson, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tomeka Lashun Williams
Defendant:
Patrica Lawson, I. Hardin, Frank Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
