Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Williams v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv00657
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Vernon Barnett, James DeLoach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Perry v. Grantt Culliver, et al
as 10-11813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE D. PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
GRANTT CULLIVER, CHARLENE GANDY, D. BENJAMIN and others
Darwin Knight v. Officer Lane, et al
as 10-11099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARWIN KNIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER LANE, RICHARD ALLEN, GRANTT CULLIVER and others
Cunningham v. Culliver et al
as 1:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Cunningham, Jr.
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Watson Bishop, C. T. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00835
Plaintiff:
Anthony N. Jones
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Doctor Barnes, Donny Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00780
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dawson
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Richard Allen, Mr. Capshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Dunford et al
as 1:2009cv00641
Plaintiff:
Jason Wesley Chapman
Defendant:
COI Dunford, Grantt Culliver, Holman Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Wilford et al
as 1:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
Ricky Crawford
Defendant:
Mr. Wilford, Don Gillgrest, Dr. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00435
Plaintiff:
Leviticus Pruitt
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Tyrone Jenkins, Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagood v. Summers et al
as 1:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
William Hagood
Defendant:
Chris Summers, Grantt Culliver and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
