Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Kopp et al v. United States et al
as 5:2019cv00826
Defendant:
David L. Young, United States, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Kopp and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rayhill v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00715
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Rayhill, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Insco v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., John/Jane Doe and Pam Moore
Plaintiff:
Michael Insco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Adkins et al
as 3:2018cv01373
Defendant:
Officer Melissa Mannon, I-XI John/Jane Doe, I-X Officers John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Timberlake Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Farmer et al
as 3:2018cv01355
Defendant:
Unit Manager Cecil Pritt, Administrator King, C.O. Adkins and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Timberlake Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Barker et al
as 2:2018cv01318
Defendant:
Richard Barker, PsiMed, Inc., Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinones v. Pile et al
as 2:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Quinones
Defendant:
Ana Pile, Greg Young, Don Scurloch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. West Virginia Regional Jail Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2018cv01074
Plaintiff:
Farrell G. Kelly
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail Correctional Facility Authority , Barrett, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knouse et al v. Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01014
Plaintiff:
Hannah Knouse and Charles Knouse
Defendant:
Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. , Primecare Medical, Inc. , The West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
