Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Amerson v. Spears et al
as 3:2019cv00454
Plaintiff:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Sheriff Billy Sollie, Major Melissa McCarter and Casey R. Spears
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Centurion Healthcare HM LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00545
Respondent:
B McCarter, FNU Halstead, Dr. Richard Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Edgar Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2018cv00535
Plaintiff:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Ofc. Anthony Coleman, Sgt. Latoya Bennett, Major Melissa McCarter and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CENTURION HEALTHCARE HM LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
EDGAR LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTHCARE HM LLC, B MCCARTER, HALSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CENTURION HEALTHCARE HM LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
EDGAR LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTHCARE HM LLC, B MCCARTER, HALSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv00133
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANKLIN MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv04395
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANKLIN MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarter v. Nelson Coleman Correctional Center
as 2:2017cv11478
Plaintiff:
Cortney Lawrence McCarter
Defendant:
Nelson Coleman Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Sollie et al
as 3:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Lawalter Rashaurd Mitchell
Defendant:
Billie Sollie, Unknown Robinson, Unknown McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumrall v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00914
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sumrall
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Marcus Davis, John Doe Ray Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
