Cases 21 - 30 of 112
MAFFETT v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GENE MAFFETT
Defendant:
DAVE WEDDING, RANDY STOKES, NURSING STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00322
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, VANIHEL, NURSE COAKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. LEMON et al
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMON, FRANK VANIHEL, S. TIERNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORKMON v. RDC CORRECTIONAL OFFICER et al
as 1:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
KAMERON JUSTICE ORKMON
Defendant:
RDC CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and RDC CORRECTIONAL OFFICER AND NURSE'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE, et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB, ROBERT CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNDERWOOD v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2021cv02938
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER UNDERWOOD
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION DIRECTOR, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. NAME et al
as 1:2021cv02485
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY LOPEZ
Defendant:
NAME, UNKNOWN MALE, CORECIVIC MEDICAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. UNKNOWN OFFICER et al
as 1:2021cv02486
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER, CORECIVIC UN-KNOWN, OFFICER FEMALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNOWDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
OREN SNOWDEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER, J DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AMOS v. BYRD et al
as 2:2021cv00264
Defendant:
NURSE KIMBERLY HOBSON, NURSE L. CUPP, WEXFORD CORR. SERV. and others
Plaintiff:
ROYAL AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
