Cases 31 - 40 of 105
CLARK v. BAY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
LLOYD CURTIS CLARK
Defendant:
BAY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and HANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Doe et al
as 3:2017cv00330
Plaintiff:
Sean Hanks
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe, Charles Heck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06077
Plaintiff:
HANK T. COLEMAN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JAMES OWEN, C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Crosswhite, Sr. v. Kevin Lyons, et al
as 16-3434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE R. CROSSWHITE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN LYONS, STEVEN R. SMITH, CHAD OBERLE and others
Polansky v. McCoole
as 16-1887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER POLANSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANN MARIE MCCOOLE, NHSP Secure Psychiatric Unit Nurse Coordinator, in her individual and official capacities
Defendant:
RICHARD M. GERRY, Warden, NH State Prison, in his individual and official capacities, JOHN FOUTS, Major, NH State Prison, in his individual and official capacities, JEFF FETTER, M.D., in his individual and official capacities and others
Hanks v. Dart
as 1:2016cv06890
Plaintiff:
Sean Hanks
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv00639
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Spivey
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, G Taylor, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall White v. Lois Lindorff, et al
as 16-2130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL S. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOIS LINDORFF, KUL SOOD, PAMELA A. BLOOMFIELD and others
Tom Fields v. Warden, et al
as 16-11445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOM FREDERICK FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN, Security, CHIEF COUNSELOR LETITIA BELL and others
Boyd v. Leffeler et al
as 2:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M Boyd
Defendant:
Lt Leffeler , CO Gallinger, CO Wigel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
