Cases 31 - 40 of 142
CHAMBERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
EBONY CHAMBERS and ROBERT TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Manton et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Manton, . Huston, M Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dale et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Defendant:
D Dale, C Schultz, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seabrook v. Doe #3 et al
as 1:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Onaje Kudura Seabrook
Defendant:
Jane Doe #3, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jonathan Rivera v. Centurion, et al
as 22-16818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ERIC RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTURION, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as P.C.S.D. Medical Intake Jane Doe #1, PIMA COUNTY ADULT DETENTION COMPLEX and others
Cullum v. Pritzker et al
as 2:2022cv02256
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Tiffanie Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naydenov v. Doe, et al
as 1:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
Andre Naydenov
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sawyer et al
as 3:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
Sawyer, C/O Dunlap, C/O Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Neel Hardin
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Gloria Waldon, McGraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullum v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Cherryle Hinthorne, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
