Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Smiley v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Smiley
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Rehabiliative Initiatives in Correction, Veit Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Lester et al
as 1:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Hale
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Jerry Lane, Melvin Tiry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Lester et al
as 4:2016cv01102
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Hale
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Jerry Lane, Melvin Tiry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarbrough v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Johnathan E Scarbrough
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Breanne Spillman, Mason Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Hamilton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Ball
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dean McClain
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Grainger County Detention Center and Jessie Cummins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jamie Matthew Riley
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neely v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv00107
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Neely, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Thomas W Graham, Sherri Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddings et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 4:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Donald F Caldwell
Defendant:
State of Tennessee and Lincoln County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Torrez v. CCA, et al
as 11-17367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TORREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, incorporated under the laws of the State of Tennessee and licensed to do business in Arizona, MARK REED, Captain at LPCC, JUNE HORRISBERGER, Unit Manager at LPCC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
