Prison Condition Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 51 - 60 of 86
SAMPLE v. THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02689
Defendant: ROB GASKILL, THE INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGGS v. HILL et al
as 1:2020cv01832
Defendant: FRIESE, MILAN, COLE and others
Plaintiff: DANIEL P. HIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOTEP-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01567
Defendant: ROBERT CARTER, JR., JOE HOGSETT, DAVID ZIEMBA and others
Plaintiff: YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. RIPLEY COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2020cv01507
Plaintiff: ANDREW E. HILL
Defendant: RIPLEY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPLE v. THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2020cv00117
Defendant: ROB GASKILL, THE INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, THE BARTHOLOMEW CO. COMMUNITY CORRECTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DAVID SAMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGGS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv00712
Defendant: FRIESE, MILAN, CURTIS HILL and others
Plaintiff: DANIEL P. HIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00094
Defendant: RICHARD BROWN, MCCLOUD, K. MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff: ASHER HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROMINGER v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00437
Defendant: STEPHEN R. HILL, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES and LAFLOWERS
Plaintiff: RAYMOND STROMINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2019cv00586
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Plaintiff: JOSHUA HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HILL v. WARDEN
as 2:2019cv00454
Defendant: WARDEN
Plaintiff: DEMETRIUS HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?