Cases 51 - 60 of 207
Sierra v. John Doe 22 et al
as 6:2022cv06042
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Sierra
Defendant:
John Doe 22, Captain Rzerniak, J. Fitchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2022cv04019
Plaintiff:
Everardo Salinas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waller v. Walters et al
as 4:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Maurice A Waller
Defendant:
Issac Walters, Paul Wyant, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLER v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. WALLER
Defendant:
ISSAC WALTERS, PAUL WYANT, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Spano et al
as 1:2021cv11112
Plaintiff:
Eryn J. Hernandez
Defendant:
J. Spano, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Shah et al
as 3:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
David M. Boswell, Jr.
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weldon v. Watson
as 3:2021cv01313
Plaintiff:
Willie Weldon
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Lieutenant David Landman, Daniel Gillum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2021cv08451
Plaintiff:
Javon Davis
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Dixon Correctinal Center Staff Members et al
as 1:2021cv04402
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cole
Defendant:
Dixon Correctinal Center Staff Members, C/O Simpson, C/O Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
