Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Thompson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00674
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Thompson
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Richard Porter, Thomas Seacord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 10-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK A. MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL and others
Rainier v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Rainier, Sr.
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacy Williams v. C. Sander
as 10-6707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LACY LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. SANDERS, Head of Detention and Administration, CAPTAIN WILLIAMS, CAPTAIN TEASLEY and others
Lockley v. Owens et al
as 1:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Lockley
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Clay Tatum, Darryl Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paynter et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paynter, Donald Cole, Kendal Robertson and others
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Michael Knight, Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crist v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00957
Plaintiff:
William F. Crist
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Chris Klein, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens-Ali v. Pennell et al
as 1:2009cv00556
Plaintiff:
Ushango Owens-Ali
Defendant:
Frank C. Pennell, Ron Hosterman, Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
