Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Williams v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Henry Alexander Williams
Defendant:
T C Outlaw and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Namer v. USA et al
as 2:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
David I Namer
Defendant:
USA, Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruel v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Yueseyuan Cruel
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, A Smith, T Haltiwanger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2009cv00123
Plaintiff:
William E Hawkins
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman v. Ebbert et al
as 2:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Roman
Defendant:
David J Ebbert, Bedford, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. USA et al
as 2:2009cv00009
Plaintiff:
Brent M Barber
Defendant:
USA, United States Bureau of Prisons, Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lagerstrom v. Matos et al
as 2:2008cv00189
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Lagerstrom
Defendant:
Hipolito Matos, N Shah, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sisniega-Sibaja v. USA et al
as 2:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Sisniega-Sibaja
Defendant:
USA and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lewis v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Damiene Lewis
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and Azuma
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Antonelli v. Luekefeld et al
as 2:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
Michael Antonelli
Defendant:
Alison Luekefeld, Martha Depoorter, Mark Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
