Cases 71 - 80 of 262
Earl Warner v. Chris Tileston, et al
as 18-16467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WARNER, AKA Earl Reed Warner
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS TILESTON, Appeal Examiner, A. SOLIS, Chief Deputy Warden-Salinas Valley State Prison, S. GOMEZ, Classification Services Anaylst and others
Peterson v. Emanuelson et al
as 2:2018cv01057
Defendant:
CO Medina, Nurse Jane Doe #2, Lt Emanuelson and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Bolanos et al
as 1:2018cv04048
Plaintiff:
Daniel Contreras
Defendant:
Carlos Bolanos, Scott Kirkpatrick, Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contreras v. Bolanos et al
as 4:2018cv04048
Defendant:
Medina, Scott Kirkpatrick, Carlos Bolanos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv04640
Defendant:
Sgt Mayjack, C/O Medina, D Beachum Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stribling v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
as 4:2018cv03479
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Stribling
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Ross Haynie, Duane Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Efren Valencia v. H. Liu, et al
as 18-16052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EFREN VALENCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
H. LIU, M. VOONG, R. MONROY and others
Medina v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01730
Plaintiff:
Judith Medina
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Trevino v. E. Dotson, et al
as 18-15032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT TREVINO
Defendant - Appellee:
E. DOTSON, D. AMBRIZ, D. VEGA and others
Gess v. Medina et al.
as 1:2017cv03061
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gess
Defendant:
Angel Medina, Arlin R Peterson, ST. Mary Corwin Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
