Cases 81 - 90 of 136
Roger Thompson v. Steven Conant, et al
as 13-2985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER N. THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN CONANT, CATHERINE KEEFER, CHRISTINA MAXWELL and others
Rahman v. Schriro et al
as 7:2013cv06095
Plaintiff:
Esteban Herrera, Sean Smith, Malik Rahman and others
Defendant:
Commissioner Dora Schriro, Warden Luis Rivera, Deputy Warden Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. City Of New York
as 13-2875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Argenis Santos
Defendant - Appellee:
Warden Rikers Island Otis Bantum Correctional Center / Central Punitive Segregation Unit, Alicia Nicholls, R.P.A., Marshall Tse, M.D. and others
Coleman v. State of New York Employee's et al
as 7:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
William Coleman
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, MD, Khan, Cabbaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. State of New York Employee's et al
as 1:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
William Coleman
Defendant:
State of New York Employee's, Carl J. Koenigsmann, MD, Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Luh v. Corey Farnsworth, et al
as 12-3422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey f Farnsworth, Brigette Rose, Tyler Chavez and others
Robinson v. Khan et al
as 1:2012cv06744
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Khan, Unknown Male Caucasian C.O., Plaskett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2012cv06914
Plaintiff:
Ronald Campbell
Defendant:
Doctor Khan and Doctor Ed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. CONANT et al
as 1:2012cv01177
Defendant:
DR. CONANT, CATHORINE KEEFER, QAISIN KHAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv04256
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Dari Wiley, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
