Cases 1 - 10 of 339
Authement v. Card et al
as 6:2024cv06068
Plaintiff:
Jerry Peter Authement
Defendant:
Cpl Mark Card, Samae Tucker, Sgt Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. White et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Curtis Morris
Defendant:
Jacob White and J B Hoyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. Smith # 168 et al
as 6:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
W. Smith # 168 and B. Rosburg # 366
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Scott Taylor, M Kelly, B Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Otts et al
as 6:2024cv06017
Plaintiff:
Ce'drick D. Brown
Defendant:
Major Fredrick Otts, Sergeant B. Morgan and Corporal Shanlever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Snyder, Sheila Robertson, Jacob White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
