Cases 1 - 10 of 17
DEAL v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
PAULA SMITH, KENNTH PRICE, JR., BEVERLY PERDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Chrzan, Jr. v. Paul Butler, Jr.
as 15-7378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN M. CHRZAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL G. BUTLER, JR., Chairman, NC Parole Commission, WILLIS J. FOWLER, Commissioner, ANTHONY E. RAND, Commissioner and others
Defendant:
PATRICK L. MCCRORY, Governor and BEVERLY PERDUE
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Beverly Perdue
as 15-6963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BEVERLY PERDUE, DR. KENNETH PRICE, JR., WARDEN BARNES and others
DEAL v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
BEVERLY PERDUE, KENNETH PRICE, JR, BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Willingham v. H.L. Jackson
as 12-6830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES D. WILLINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
H. L. JACKSON, Superintendent, D. DAVIS, Assistant, OFFICER MACE and others
FRANKLIN EL v. PERDUE
as 1:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
STANLEY E. FRANKLIN EL
Defendant:
BEVERLY PERDUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STALLINGS v. PERDUE et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
LOUIS RAY STALLINGS, JR.
Defendant:
BEVERLY PERDUE, ROBERT LEWIS, REUBEN YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrance James v. NC Department of Correction
as 11-7565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE LAMOUNT JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ALVIN KELLER, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Dunbar v. Bell et al
as 5:2011ct03226
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Leonard Dunbar
Defendant:
Ronald Bell, Jr., Beverly Perdue, Alvin W. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. NC Department of Correction et al
as 5:2011ct03182
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
NC Department of Correction, Alvin Keller, Robert C. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
