Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Hinton v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Jordan Hinton
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Daniel Dougherty, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Darryl Crenshaw
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Yesu, Zuckerbraun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaine v. Berris et al
as 3:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
Jayevon L. Blaine
Defendant:
Peter Berris, Lynne Munday, J. Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Barroga et al
as 3:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Chazantine Griffin
Defendant:
Marissa Barroga, Debra Cruz, Julie Leschinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibbison v. Scagliarni et al
as 3:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Ibbison
Defendant:
Scagliarni, Swol, Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Fener et al
as 3:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
LaDean Daniels
Defendant:
Fener, Carlie, J. Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Gongne et al
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
LaDean Daniels
Defendant:
Gongne, K. Phillips, J. Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Louis v. Cook et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Chadwick St. Louis
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, Robert Martin, Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
