Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Singletary v. Stirling et al
as 9:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A. Singletary
Defendant:
Brian P. Stirling, Jana Hollis, Stephen Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Givens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv03577
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Givens
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Dir. Brian P. Stirling, Regional Dir. Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Sterling Singleton v. Frank Richardson
as 22-1234
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STERLING L. SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK RICHARDSON, WARDEN JOYNER and WAYNE BOWMAN
Defendant:
SCDC, BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of SCDC, ASSOCIATE WARDEN SHARP and others
Sterling Singleton v. SCDC
as 22-6191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STERLING L. SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
SCDC, BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of SCDC, FRANK RICHARDSON and others
Nesbit, Jr. v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00960
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp, Mark Bethea and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Nesbit, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. SCDC et al
as 9:2021cv00650
Defendant:
SCDC, Brian P Stirling, Frank Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling L. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Williams et al
as 0:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Michelle Chambers, Tim E. Rogers, Bryan P. Stirlings and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herriott v. Stirling et al
as 6:2019cv00804
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Willie Davis, Richard Cothran and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Edward Herriott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 9:2018cv01880
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, Dept of Corrections, N.C. Marchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 8:2018cv01880
Defendant:
David C Norton, Alan M Wilson, Brian P Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
