Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Fourstar et al v. Berkebile et al
as 4:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr. and Robert Mitchell, Sr.
Defendant:
Mary Smitherene, Unknow United States Probation and Parole Officer, Unknown Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 5:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
Asa Roberts
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, David Berkebile, Virgil Ensey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mohammed v. Holder, et al
as 14-1325
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KHALFAN KHAMIS MOHAMMED
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, DAVID BERKEBILE, ADX Warden and others
Colon v. Berkebile
as 14-1063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUSTAVO COLON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE
Leffebre v. Davis, et al
as 14-1046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE DAVID LEFFEBRE
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE R. DAVIS, DAVID BERKEBILE, CAPTAIN KRIST and others
Pinson v. Balsick et al
as 1:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
A. Balsick, N. Lee, G. Sandusky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruce v. Coulter et al
as 1:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Jennifer Coulter, Oneal, Richard Madison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffries v. Holder Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
Vernell A. Jeffries
Defendant:
Erick Holder Jr., David Berkebile, D. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradley v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bradley
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Berkebile, Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leffebre v. Davis, et al
as 13-1528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE DAVID LEFFEBRE
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE R. DAVIS, DAVID BERKEBILE, CAPTAIN KRIST and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
