Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Lynn v. Willnauer, et al
as 23-3111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLIE WILLNAUER, MARY YOAKUM, TONI SINCLAIR and others
Brown (ID 95054) v. Lundry et al
as 5:2019cv03152
Defendant:
Debra Lundry, Jennifer Clements, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn (ID 64377) v. Willnauer et al
as 5:2019cv03117
Defendant:
Rajwinder Kaur, Lacy Osmon, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ferola v. Powell et al
as 9:2015cv00749
Plaintiff:
Michael J Ferola
Defendant:
Perry Powell, Patricia Conyers, Robert Brayboy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Baccus v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-6955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, a/k/a John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., SCDC Director, LARRY CARTLEDGE, PCI Warden, NC MERCHANT, PCI Mailroom Manager and others
Locklear v. Stirling et al
as 5:2014cv02166
Plaintiff:
John Henry Locklear
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Willie E Eagleton, Roland McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Leggins et al
as 1:2014cv01161
Plaintiff:
Anthony James
Defendant:
Ms Leggins, David Tatarsky and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Nesbitt v. SC Department of Correction
as 14-6114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH NESBITT
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYGER RIVER CI, TIM RILEY, Warden Tyger River Correctional and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
