Cases 1 - 10 of 66
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department et al
as 5:2024ct03068
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Windsor Police Department, City of Windsor, Bertie County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Clark et al
as 5:2024ct03043
Plaintiff:
John Frank Miller
Defendant:
Ms. Clark, Ms. Lee, Cpt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Wilson
as 5:2023ct03076
Plaintiff:
John Frank Miller
Defendant:
Ms. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Pittman
as 5:2022ct03424
Plaintiff:
Frank Junour McDonald
Defendant:
Lt. Michael Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Vorhes et al
as 5:2022ct03210
Plaintiff:
John Frank Miller
Defendant:
Mr. Vorhes, Mr. Bodie and John Doe Kitchen Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxendine v. Carr et al
as 5:2021ct03366
Plaintiff:
Christopher Oxendine and Christopher M. Oxendine-Bey
Defendant:
Sgt. John Carr, Sgt. John Locklear, Sgt. John Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wake County Courts
as 5:2021ct03352
Plaintiff:
Perry R. Brown, IV and Percy R. Brown, IV
Defendant:
Wake County Courts, District Attorney's Office of NC, Raleigh Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYLVESTER v. MARTIAN et al
as 1:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SHAWN SYLVESTER
Defendant:
ALLEN B. MARTIAN, NURSE BRITTANY BELGER, CODY JOHSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
