Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jordan v. King
as 22-60509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerett Jordan
Defendant / Appellee:
Ron King, Superintendent, James Fillyaw, Warden, John Doe, Tower Officer at the Time of the Incident and others
Hoskins v. Eovaldi et al
as 3:2017cv01122
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Defendant:
Frank Eovaldi, C/O Sanders, Sgt. Lindenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Held v. Adam et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Edward Frank Held, IV
Defendant:
Ricky Adam, Brandon Zeringue and David Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Forthenberry v. Andrew Tilden, et al
as 16-3586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR FORTHENBERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW TILDEN, Doctor, Medical Director at Pontiac Correctional Center, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of Illinois Department of Corrections and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, a privately held corporation
Coleman v. Crews et al
as 3:2016cv01004
Plaintiff:
Shaw V. Coleman
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, Julie L. Jones, Corizon Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKES v. WALTON, et al
as 2:2012cv01237
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant:
JOHN WALTON, STEVEN J. CMAR, PRISON BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKES v. WALTON et al
as 2:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant:
JOHN WALTON, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON BOARD, TOM DAVERSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKES v. WALTON et al
as 2:2012cv01236
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant:
JOHN WALTON, MELISSA BOGGS, PRISON BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKES v. WALTON et al
as 2:2012cv01235
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant:
JOHN WALTON, STEVEN J. CMAR, ERIC SCHWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Schroeder v. Doug Drankiewicz, et al
as 12-2305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SCHROEDER
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUG DRANKIEWICZ and KARL HELD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
