Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Riley v. Waterman et al
as 2:2020cv01252
Defendant:
W Brown, Sandra McArdle, A Broadbent and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adell v. Boughton et al
as 1:2019cv00868
Defendant:
Warden Gary Boughton, Chrystal Marchant, R Grackowski and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Adell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson, Kendall et al v. Litscher, Jon et al
as 3:2017cv00635
Plaintiff:
Kendall D. Gipson
Defendant:
Jon E. Litscher , Cathy Jess, Gary Boughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-3226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant, Prison Guard, Logan Correctional Center and EDDIE J. PAYNE, Prison Guard, Pinckneyville Prison
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-2658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-2589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Nathaniel Jackson v. Lieutenant Willis, et al
as 12-3030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIS, Prison Guard, Logan Correctional Center and EDDIE J. PAYNE, Prison Guard, Pinckneyville Prison
Nathaniel Jackson v. Lieutenant Willis, et al
as 12-2861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WILLIS and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Dotson v. Denny et al
as 5:2011cv06007
Plaintiff:
Lloyd G Dotson, Jr
Defendant:
Larry Denny, Terry Page, M Parkhurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allee v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00655
Plaintiff:
Donald Ernest Allee
Defendant:
Mr. Beaumont, Sr., Jane #1 Doe, Jane #2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
