Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Sharif Moore v. Peter Danza
as 24-6391
Plaintiff:
SHARIF HAKIM MOORE
Defendant:
PETER T. DANZA, JASON JARMAN, ANTHONY J. TAYLOR and others
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
T. Knox, Newman, Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Oscar Thomas
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis Police Department, Rachel Jewell, Steven Lee Saucier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharif Moore v. Peter Danza
as 23-6680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARIF HAKIM MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER T. DANZA, D. S. WISE, KIM FOYE and others
Murzike v. Putney et al
as 3:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Putney, Holly, Nolles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry et al v. Taylor et al
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Perry, Jr and Alexander Kane
Defendant:
Officer J Taylor and Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barzee v. Abdulla et al
as 7:2023cv02328
Plaintiff:
Saio Barzee
Defendant:
Sing Sing C.O. A.M. Abdulla, Sing Sing C.O. E. Torres, Sing Sing C.O. V. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Williams, J. Taylor, R. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birk-Ail-El v. Taylor et al
as 2:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
O'Syris Lord Birk-Ail-El, Syris T Birkley and O
Defendant:
J Taylor and Amika Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
