Cases 1 - 10 of 18
SIMMONS v. OFFICER WILSON
as 2:2022cv01644
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Defendant:
OFFICER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. CARNEY
as 2:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. GIANETTA et al
as 2:2021cv04962
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SIMMONS
Respondent:
NANCY GIANETTA, C/O PETERS, C/O COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Maguire Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2021cv04366
Defendant:
LA County Jail, LA County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Rob Joseph Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 5:2020cv09282
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, Ralph Diaz, J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. BROWN et al
as 5:2018cv06890
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Director Will Lightbourne, Michael Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. BROWN et al
as 5:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS
Defendant:
EDMUND G BROWN, JR, ALEX PADILIA, XAVIER BECERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Desmond et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Mafidh as Salafi, Christopher Desmond, Idris Young and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
