Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Stinson, Mark v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2024cv02532
Defendant:
Damon K. Griffin, John T. Fowlkes and Nathan P. Brooks
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Joshua Horton
Defendant:
Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, Tennessee Department of Correction, Northwest Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. John Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones
Defendant:
John Doe, Warden Watwood, Assistant Warden Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02292
Plaintiff:
Robert Burnett
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Sullivan County Justice Center et al
as 2:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Thurman P Lane
Defendant:
Sullivan County Justice Center and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Johnson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
George P Ford
Defendant:
Johnson County Sheriff's Department and Mike Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrowood v. Fontes et al
as 2:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
William P Arrowood
Defendant:
Armando Fontes and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Anderson et al
as 2:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Martin
Defendant:
Wain Anderson and Barry P Staubus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Washington County Detention Center Medical Staff
as 2:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Vincent P Watts
Defendant:
Washington County Detention Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
