Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Fernando Bustillo v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 12-2019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley Lappin, Med.Director Newton Kending, Michael K. Nelley and others
Adams v. Campbell et al
as 5:2011cv03080
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Adams
Defendant:
David Campbell, William McCullum, Kathleen McBratney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fernando Bustillo v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-1737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley Lappin, Med.Director Newton Kending, Michael K. Nelley and others
Charles Stockwell v. Gordon Kanan, et al
as 11-10107
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES STOCKWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
GORDON KANAN, DANNY MARRERO, SANDRA BUTLER and others
v. Bustillo et al
as 6:2010cv03326
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, John Doe, Michael K Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnett v. Gapasin et al
as 6:2010cv03112
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Barnett
Defendant:
Ernesto Gapasin and Paul Celestin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Eddington v. King et al
as 6:2010cv03047
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Eddington
Defendant:
Robert King, Paul Celestin, Marty C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Prindle v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Prindle
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tamez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stockwell v. USA
as 4:2010cv00031
Respondent:
Gordon Kanan, Danny Marrero, Gordon Kanan and others
Petitioner:
Charles Stockwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Jeter et al
as 4:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
Rodney B. Thomas
Defendant:
NFN Jeter, NFN Butler, NFN Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
