Cases 1 - 10 of 31
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
DEVON POWELL
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EMERSON, POWELL, ANDERSON, JAMES v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
JERRY EMERSON, DAMON POWELL, CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICKLES et al v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES, NGHIA PARKER, PATRICE POWELL and others
Defendant:
TERRI HARRIS, CORDOVA, GALLERIA MALL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
POWELL v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
DEVON POWELL
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. ALDERSON
as 1:2021cv01302
Defendant:
KARLEIGH ALDERSON
Plaintiff:
DONALD POWELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
ANDERSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Defendant:
CRAWFORD, RUDOLPH, UNKNOWN OFFICERS WORKING 2-D THIS DATE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMARRIS LEWIS, STEPHEN HUTCHINSON, JAMES GRIFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2020cv03248
Defendant:
TOMAW, BRAD, ROWL and others
Plaintiff:
JERALD BROUDE, RICHARD M. REEVES, PATRICK B. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2020cv02568
Defendant:
POWELL, MARK SEVIERE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v Hyett et al
as 3:2020cv00623
Defendant:
Powell, Thomson, Hyett and others
Plaintiff:
Malcom D Cobb, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
