Cases 1 - 10 of 102
CHANDLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
ROGER CHANDLER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLETCHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
REGAN v. JONES et al
as 2:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
LEROY REGAN
Defendant:
ROGER JONES, U.S.P. TERRE HAUTE F.B.O.P. HEALTH SERVICE DEPT. REAL PARTY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROGERS v. BAGIESKI et al
as 1:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Defendant:
M. BAGIESKI, C. BALES and CENTURION HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARKS v. WELLS et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
DEVON E. STARKS
Defendant:
J. WELLS, VIGO COUNTY SECURITY CENTER, ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ROGERS
Defendant:
JESSICA HEATHERLY, M. SUMMERS, DIALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. MOUNT et al
as 1:2022cv02470
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS R MORRIS
Defendant:
JASON M. MOUNT, ROGER J DUVALL and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINGLE v. GOVERNMENT
as 3:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
CAMERON v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
BRUCE LLOYD CAMERON
Defendant:
T. RULE, R. TURNER and A. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
