Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Woods v. Wiley
as 22-30401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicholas L. Woods
Defendant / Appellee:
B. Wiley, Federal Officer, Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale, LA (Low), S. Mata, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale, LA (Low), S I A Deville, S.I.A. Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale, LA (Low) and others
Woods v. Wiley et al
as 2:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Nicholas L Woods
Defendant:
B Wiley, S Mata and S I A Deville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. Lovett et al
as 1:2021cv02508
Plaintiff:
William D Mercer, Jr.
Defendant:
S. (I) Lovett and S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2020cv03693
Defendant:
J. McBride, S. Burtlow, Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANTLEY v. SAM et al
as 3:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GRANTLEY
Defendant:
E L SAM, S I YUN, M NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Grantley v. E. Sam, et al
as 16-10778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK GRANTLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. SAM, Mental Health Professional, S. I. YUN, Licensed Provisional Psychologist and M. NICHOLS, Nurse Practitioner
Michael et al v. Cruz et al
as 1:2012cv02726
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Michael and Malachi Z. K. York
Defendant:
Maureen Cruz, Maureen (I) Cruz, Jack Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Lukens et al
as 3:2012cv00523
Plaintiff:
Ira Demetrius McPherson
Defendant:
Lukens, Bryon C. Dickerson, S. I. Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blum v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv02257
Plaintiff:
James F. Blum
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Travis (I) Trani, Travis Trani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rocha v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Rocha
Defendant:
A. (I) Zavaras, A. Zavaras, George (I) W. Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
