Cases 1 - 10 of 25
MATTHEWS v. GOOD et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
JAMAR MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SERGEANT GOOD, LIEUTENANT HUSTOSKY, SUPERINTENDENT HAINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. SCHROCK et al
as 3:2023cv08552
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Defendant:
SCHROCK, J DUNN, HARVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JERRY-EL v. HARRY
as 3:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
BERNARD JERRY-EL
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, DAVID PISCZEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROCK JR. v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2022cv01697
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALAN SHROCK JR. and MATTHEW ALAN SCHROCK, JR.
Defendant:
GARY LEWIS, SPIEGAL, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROCK v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2022cv01698
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SCHROCK and MATTHEW ALAN SCHROCK, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, GEO GROUP, INC., ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROCK v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
M. A. SCHROCK, JR.
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., GEO INC., WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHROCK v. GEO INC.
as 1:2021cv02607
Plaintiff:
M. A. SCHROCK, JR.
Defendant:
GEO INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JERRY-EL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
BERNARD C. JERRY-EL
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, MS. ANGEL, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BLAKE v. SCHROCK et al
as 3:2021cv00351
Defendant:
JANE DOE, TIMOTHY BUTLER, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. FRAME
as 3:2020cv05968
Plaintiff:
STACY ANTONIO SCOTT, JR and STACY CHANEL
Defendant:
W TURNER, D DICE, P TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
